Post your rejection discussions here.

For the camera buffs.

Post your rejection discussions here.

Postby Jason Milligan » Wed Oct 04, 2006 12:50 pm

Just keep it to the point.
User avatar
Jason Milligan
Moderator
Moderator
 
Posts: 225
Joined: Thu Jul 08, 2004 6:45 pm
Location: Adelaide

Postby Carsten Bauer » Tue Oct 31, 2006 12:32 am

Indoor Terminal photos, Bad Motiv
http://www.airliners.net/addphotos/rejections/big/20061028_numloxx_YPPH_QF_Terminal_IMG_8907.jpg
and
http://www.airliners.net/addphotos/rejections/big/20061028_numloxx_YPPH_QF_Terminal_outside_IMG_8920.jpg

were both rejected for Bad Motiv. I've checked out many other indoor terminal photos around Australia (Not many of them) and I cant really tell why both of mine were rejected. I'm planning another few from inside Terminal 1 in the next few weeks, but whats the point if it's all bad motiv.

Comments and suggestions are appreciated.

Carsten
3NM W of PH VOR
Next Flights:
2013 FLIGHTS: PER-DXB-LHR, MUC-DXB-PER
Numloxx's Flightlog
jetphotos.net
User avatar
Carsten Bauer
Mega Poster
Mega Poster
 
Posts: 1921
Joined: Tue Jul 06, 2004 10:45 am
Location: 3.1NM WNW PH VOR

Postby Jules A » Tue Oct 31, 2006 1:37 am

For the first one, I daresay they aren't interested in any internal shots unless it is of the check-in area or the main concourse.

As for the second, you would more than likely need to get a shot of the terminal without the cars and the fence in the shot. Bloody hard I know but that's anet for you.
YBAF
Jules A
Senior Member
Senior Member
 
Posts: 642
Joined: Thu Nov 11, 2004 9:29 pm
Location: Brisbane, Australia

Postby Carsten Bauer » Tue Oct 31, 2006 4:57 am

Cheers,

Now all we need is a proper airport terminal that's as fancy as Changi or Frankfurt.
3NM W of PH VOR
Next Flights:
2013 FLIGHTS: PER-DXB-LHR, MUC-DXB-PER
Numloxx's Flightlog
jetphotos.net
User avatar
Carsten Bauer
Mega Poster
Mega Poster
 
Posts: 1921
Joined: Tue Jul 06, 2004 10:45 am
Location: 3.1NM WNW PH VOR

Postby Jules A » Tue Oct 31, 2006 11:55 am

They don't call it the Euro Boys Club for nothing!
YBAF
Jules A
Senior Member
Senior Member
 
Posts: 642
Joined: Thu Nov 11, 2004 9:29 pm
Location: Brisbane, Australia

Postby Montague S » Tue Oct 31, 2006 2:55 pm

both are fair rejections...first one, what's it showing? a cityflyer sign or a baggage carousel, not really focused on anything in particular.

2nd one...just looks like i'm viewing a road with a rail and a taxi rank. find something more interesting to focus on, baggage carousel's & road's aren't exactly what i'd call interesting.
photo's Updated 10 June

My Flights

Next Trip: Mel-Dxb-Jfk-Sfo-Dxb-Mel. EK/AA
User avatar
Montague S
Prolific Member
Prolific Member
 
Posts: 2088
Joined: Mon Jul 05, 2004 11:11 pm
Location: Brunswick, Melbourne

Postby Carsten Bauer » Wed Nov 01, 2006 1:14 am

I see your point Monty. Cheers
3NM W of PH VOR
Next Flights:
2013 FLIGHTS: PER-DXB-LHR, MUC-DXB-PER
Numloxx's Flightlog
jetphotos.net
User avatar
Carsten Bauer
Mega Poster
Mega Poster
 
Posts: 1921
Joined: Tue Jul 06, 2004 10:45 am
Location: 3.1NM WNW PH VOR

Postby Montague S » Wed Nov 01, 2006 8:04 am

as much as we see the rule as stupid we've got to live by it if we upload...to bad photography isn't about rules.
photo's Updated 10 June

My Flights

Next Trip: Mel-Dxb-Jfk-Sfo-Dxb-Mel. EK/AA
User avatar
Montague S
Prolific Member
Prolific Member
 
Posts: 2088
Joined: Mon Jul 05, 2004 11:11 pm
Location: Brunswick, Melbourne

Postby Ashok Monks » Sun Nov 05, 2006 9:49 am

Got this rejection for Digital Manipulation.

http://www.jetphotos.net/viewreject_b.php?id=1194121

and I havent Digitally Manipulated it so im not sure why I got this rejection.Hoping someone can help me.

Thanks, Ashok :D
User avatar
Ashok Monks
Senior Member
Senior Member
 
Posts: 802
Joined: Sat Mar 05, 2005 6:25 pm
Location: Melbourne, Australia...

Postby Brett M » Sun Nov 05, 2006 9:56 am

Ashok Monks wrote:Got this rejection for Digital Manipulation.

http://www.jetphotos.net/viewreject_b.php?id=1194121

and I havent Digitally Manipulated it so im not sure why I got this rejection.Hoping someone can help me.

Thanks, Ashok :D


Hi Ashok,

I'm guessing it was because it looks as though the picture was cropped into a 'nice square shape' but the a/c needs some 'air' in front of it so it looks like it has somewhere to go. In other words, good as a sticker but not as a photo of an airborne a/c

Brett
Image
User avatar
Brett M
Senior Member
Senior Member
 
Posts: 535
Joined: Thu Feb 09, 2006 8:14 pm
Location: Mawson Lakes, South Australia

Postby Montague S » Sun Nov 05, 2006 10:23 am

it's oversharp i can tell you that much...
photo's Updated 10 June

My Flights

Next Trip: Mel-Dxb-Jfk-Sfo-Dxb-Mel. EK/AA
User avatar
Montague S
Prolific Member
Prolific Member
 
Posts: 2088
Joined: Mon Jul 05, 2004 11:11 pm
Location: Brunswick, Melbourne

Postby Todd v.K » Sun Nov 05, 2006 7:12 pm

cut out the right wingtip slightly and is soft and tried to correct this and is subsequently oversharpened, if your pictures are that soft that you have to kick that much into it, not even worth trying to sharpen in editing. One of those you just have to let go and try again
Koninklijke Luchtvaart Maatschappij (KLM)
The Flying Dutchman

German is a language which was developed solely to afford the speaker the opportunity to spit at strangers under the guise of polite conversation.
National Lampoon
User avatar
Todd v.K
Senior Member
Senior Member
 
Posts: 569
Joined: Sun Nov 28, 2004 6:58 pm
Location: Maastricht, The Netherlands

Postby Ashok Monks » Mon Nov 06, 2006 11:04 am

I got an email saying it was becuase the A/C looks like it was copy and pasted onto the background. I didn't copy and paste the background I blurred it to get rid of some of the noise. Anyway I won't be doing that again :oops: .

Thanks for your help, Ashok :D
User avatar
Ashok Monks
Senior Member
Senior Member
 
Posts: 802
Joined: Sat Mar 05, 2005 6:25 pm
Location: Melbourne, Australia...

Postby Paul Rodgers » Wed Nov 08, 2006 10:16 pm

I seem to be getting a lot of Dark/underexposed rejects from Jetphotos. Whilst the overcast weather in the problem photos doesn't help, I’m sure the fact that I edit on an LCD screen has something to do with it, i.e. making the photos appear brighter than they really are.
Any suggestions on how to get an accurate level of brightness displayed? On my screen they look fine, any brighter and the clouds would become glary. Are they too dark to begin with, because the more I increase the brightness, the more I have to increase the contrast and saturation?

Here are the pics:
http://www.jetphotos.net/viewreject_b.php?id=1198477
http://www.jetphotos.net/viewreject_b.php?id=1198485

and one that also had 'compression artefacts'. Please point them out as I'm not sure what or where they are.
http://www.jetphotos.net/viewreject_b.php?id=1198474

Many thanks
User avatar
Paul Rodgers
Member
Member
 
Posts: 113
Joined: Tue Jul 06, 2004 5:31 pm
Location: Sunshine Coast, Qld

Postby Jason Milligan » Wed Nov 08, 2006 11:23 pm

I think they look fine...but I'm not a screener..

Are you using a calibrated monitor Paul?
User avatar
Jason Milligan
Moderator
Moderator
 
Posts: 225
Joined: Thu Jul 08, 2004 6:45 pm
Location: Adelaide

Next

Return to Aviation Photography

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest


cron